README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_84076200
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
(1) Brief Explanation for Our Observation: This is NACO LGS S27 imaging
of 4 gravitationally lensed quasars. The targets are HE0047-1740, SDSS0924+0219,
PG1115+080, J1131-1231.
AO correction performed *on target* for targets PG1115+080, J1131-1231 and on "nearby"
stars for HE0047-1740 and SDSS0924+0219. All the tip-tilt stars are >40'' from
the targets. We are aware that this config. leads to small Strehl Ratios but only
improvement of the PSF is needed for our program.
(2) Properties of Our Science Targets: H-band mag. of the brightest component of
our science targets are as follows, HE0047-1740: 15.0; SDSS0924+0219: 18.0; PG1115+080:
15.7; J1131-1231: 15.8 ; The brightest object in the FOV is the target or is never
brighter than H=14.0
Following discussion with USD-help, we have used \"disk\" morphology for the tip-tilt
reference star ( when the later is the Target) in JNPS (i.e. to construct and aocfg
file and the ETC input file). We have checked with ETC that even with airmass=1,
peak intensity < 1/5 NACO saturation. However, if for any reason, saturation
was occurring, the support astronomer should reduce the DIT.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:32 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org