README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_84039301
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
These observations try to obtain interferometric spectroscopic time-series
observations of the late-type B supergiant beta Orionis (Rigel, B8 Ia). From optical
observations it is well-established that beta Ori has a systematically structured
and rotationally modulated stellar wind. However, little is known about the actual
extent and spatial distribution of these structures. The analysis of the wind line-profile
and visibility variations in the new high-resolution Amber Brgamma and optical spectra
will permit a rigorous assessment of the nature of the inhomogeneities in the outer
atmospheric layers and the wind of this this prototypical star and will for the
first time allow to ?picture? the structured wind of a hot massive star.
The AMBER observations aim at montioring the target over the complete observing
period with about one calibrated visibility every second week (12 visits in the
months October to March, 5 with the ATs (run A), 7 with the UTs (run B)).
The main goal is to obtain a time sequence of differential visibilities, differential
phase and closure phase observations of the Brgamma line with high spectral resolution
(HR-K mode in the full 2.149 - 2.195 micron range).
First VLTI observations of this object have been obtained in P78 with the UTs in
HRK mode but without FINITO and resulted in poor data quality. This repetition with
FINITO and the ATs and UTs is expected do deliver a superior data set.
The AMBER observations are complemeted by parallel optical high-resolution spectroscopy
at other observatories over the same time span.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
The execution of the 24 submitted OBs (10 in run A for the ATs and 14
in run B for the UTs) should be distributed over the whole observing period.
According to the P84 schedule one observation (calibrated visibility) has to be
obtained in every UT and AT VLTI slot over the period. A possible execution sequence
could be:
1 26-Oct-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-0
2 03-Nov-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-1
3 17-Nov-09 A0-K0-G1 A betaOri-0
4 05-Dec-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-2
5 23-Dec-09 A0-K0-G1 A betaOri-1
6 30-Dec-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-3
7 18-Jan-10 A0-K0-G1 A betaOri-2
8 30-Jan-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-4
9 10-Feb-10 A0-K0-G1 A betaOri-3
10 28-Feb-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-5
11 18-Mar-09 A0-K0-G1 A betaOri-4
12 25-Mar-09 UT1-UT3-UT4 B betaOri-6
The preferred baselines are A0-K0-G1 (run A) and UT1-UT3-UT4 (run B).
The observations should be carried out in the window of +/- 2 hrs from the meridian
and airmass <1.5.
HOWEVER: if scheduling constraints / weather do not allow to fulfill the above requirements,
observations at higher airmass without FINITO and with any other UT or AT triplett
configuration are acceptable.
Priority has to be given to the time sampling over the period.
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Do you use the same DIT for pairs of science target and associated calibrator?
Are the magnitudes of science target and calibrator within +/- 1 mag
?
Did you verify that your coordinates are as accurate as possible (2Mass
coordinates recommended) and that they include proper motions if available ?
Did you specify the LST range of the calibrators such that they cover
the range from 30 min before the start of the LST range of the science target to
30 min after the end of the LST range of the science target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:31 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org