README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_83098302
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
There is no particular constraints on the OBs of the following stars R
Nor, V Aqr, Z Sco, XZ Cen, R Sgr
However, Observation of SS_Oph will require you to read this :
------------------------------------------------
Please increase the number of exposures to 10 on SS_Oph (Star's magnitude K>~3,
and seeing constraint is 1.2)
SS Oph is a Mira variable with a period of 180 days. Our goal is to observe the
modification of the atmosphere over a pulsation cycle.
The optimal baseline configuration is A0-D0-H0. Optional basiline is D0-H0-G1.
After consulting the availibilities of the configurations during service mode, we
propose the following schedule of observations:
SCI_SS_Oph-0 :
Apr 04 D0-H0-G1
SCI_SS_Oph-1 :
Apr 29 D0-H0-G1
SCI_SS_Oph-2 :
May 21-29 A0-D0-H0 (including 3 half nights of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-3 :
Aug 06-10 A0-D0-H0 (including 3 half nights of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-4 :
Sep 06-08 A0-D0-H0 (including 1 half night of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-5 :
Sep 23-25 A0-D0-H0 (including 1 half night of SM)
These dates have not been placed in the "time intervals" constraint within the OBs.
If changes happen in the scheduling of the baselines, you are free to adapt the
schedule, having in mind that at least 10 days between two observations is necessary
for the science case.
-----------------------
Waiver Requests
1) About the 1.2 seeing constraint on SS_Oph
"
Since your target is just slightly fainter than the given limiting
magnitude for the atmospheric conditions and mode you define, Paranal
agrees to try your observations as they are currently defined.
Explicitely, this means that your run (C) will stay in priority
class "A", the seeing constraint will not be changed to something
better than 1.2", but you may state in
the readme file that you want to increase the number of exposures to
10. This means, the data quality _could_ be ok and comparable to the
quality as if the observations were carried out under seeing <=0.8",
but if not, the observations will not be repeated.
"
2)
your target change request is approved for the following
targets: R Nor, V Aqr, Z Sco, XZ Cen, R Sgr
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
*** Please, allow at least ten days between two observations of SS Oph
***
Suggestion :
SCI_SS_Oph-0 :
Apr 04 D0-H0-G1
SCI_SS_Oph-1 :
Apr 29 D0-H0-G1
SCI_SS_Oph-2 :
May 21-29 A0-D0-H0 (including 3 half nights of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-3 :
Aug 06-10 A0-D0-H0 (including 3 half nights of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-4 :
Sep 06-08 A0-D0-H0 (including 1 half night of SM)
SCI_SS_Oph-5 :
Sep 23-25 A0-D0-H0 (including 1 half night of SM)
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Do you use the same DIT for pairs of science target and associated calibrator?
Are the magnitudes of science target and calibrator within +/- 1 mag
?
Did you verify that your coordinates are as accurate as possible (2Mass
coordinates recommended) and that they include proper motions if available ?
Did you specify the LST range of the calibrators such that they cover
the range from 30 min before the start of the LST range of the science target to
30 min after the end of the LST range of the science target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:31 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org