README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_83032300
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
We observe two bright Wolf-Rayet stars, WR102c and WR102ka, with their
surrounding nebula. The nebula fields are expected to be faint, therefore we use
the calibration_PSF template with "inverse" offsets to get precise positions to
reconstruct the science fields from different nights.
Note: WR102c an offset between SIMBAD coordinates and assumed 2MASS point source
coordinates is found.
The Table indicates the brightest object expected in each field, according to 2MASS:
OB name K_mag
---------------------
WR102ka-01 12.00 nebula
WR102ka-02 12.00 nebula
WR102ka-03 12.00 nebula, 2MASS point source fainter than K=11mag
WR102ka-04 9.65 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102ka-05 12.00 nebula
WR102ka-06 8.84 WR102ka
WR102ka-07 12.00 nebula
WR102ka-08 12.12 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102ka-09 11.10 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102ka-10 12.00 nebula
WR102ka-11 10.32 2MASS point source without SpT
---------------------
WR102c-01 12.00 nebula
WR102c-02 12.00 nebula
WR102c-03 10.30 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102c-04 9.93 WR102c
WR102c-05 10.63 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102c-06 11.67 2MASS point source without SpT
WR102c-07 9.93 small overlapp with field WR102c-04
None of the objects is brighter than 6th magnitude in the 2MASS K-band.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
We perfom a blind offset to our science fields from reference stars. Both
these stars are very bright in the K-band, we therefore ask to skip the sky during
acquisition.
We use the calibration_PSF template with "inverse" offsets to get precise positions
to reconstruct/coadd the science fields from different nights.
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate the magnitude of the brightest object in the field in
each SINFONI OB?
If you are using the AO: Did you indicate for every OB the magnitude
of the guide star, and its distance to the target (if any)?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you use the provided StandardStar
templates?
If you are using a specific offset pattern or position angle: did you
check carefully the definition in the manual?
Did you make really sure that none of your OBs ever saturates the detector?
If you are using the AO: did you enter the correct Strehl Ratio (on-axis,
K-band) AND the seeing value in the constraint set?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:29 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org