README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_83014800
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This program aims at resolving close binaries among the given WR stars
sample to confirm binarity and potentially determine the distance of the systems.
As a secondary goal, we want to resolve the circumstellar wind for the closest and
brightest one: WR79a, and even maybe for other stars of the sample. The initial
proposal included WR43a and WR43b, which we think are too difficult given the C
priority that the OPC gave to this project. Therefore, as WR79a is our first priority
target, we switched the observing time to this star in order to repeat the observations
3 times with different hour angles (if possible).
Since most of the stars of our sample are very close to not be resolved at all in
the continuum, we request for "differential" accuracy, i.e. the absolute level of
visibility is not important to calibrate. Therefore we ask for relatively long integration
times of 0.5s (or larger if the conditions permit it) with FINITO, given that it
will work most of the time in coherencing mode.
The baselines UT1-3-4 were selected in the OBs, but observations with UT1-2-4 would
also be fine.
Our priorities are:
1st: execute the WR79a OBs to potentially resolve the stellar wind in the emission
lines. If possible it would be the best to repeat the three OBs during the same
observing night.
2nd: execute the other OBs with the different targets to measure binaries. Among
them, the priorities are decreasing with increasing K-band magnitude (in decreasing
order for priorities: WR78, WR22, WR25, WR105, WR24 and WR94). Again, observing
these different targets during the same observing nights would be a plus but is
not mandatory.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Do you use the same DIT for pairs of science target and associated calibrator?
Are the magnitudes of science target and calibrator within +/- 1 mag
?
Did you verify that your coordinates are as accurate as possible (2Mass
coordinates recommended) and that they include proper motions if available ?
Did you specify the LST range of the calibrators such that they cover
the range from 30 min before the start of the LST range of the science target to
30 min after the end of the LST range of the science target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:29 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org