README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_82090101

Principal Investigator Email Address

• pedicelli@mporzio.astro.it

Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)

• 4.06h

General Description

• The main scientific goal of this experiment is to provide
  detailed and homogeneous measurements of Galactic Cepheids
  located across the Galactic disk. This means that our targets
  are relatively bright field stars.
  
  The finding charts attached to the individual OBs are centered
  on the target and the targets are indicated by a white arrow. 
  
  During the check-in of the OBs, we received a Verification 
  Message warning: "TARGET never rises above 1.5 airmass.
  We are aware of this problem, but fortunately all this targets, 
  according to the object observability available at the ESO web page, 
  are visible with an airmass smaller than 2.0 for more than 1 hour in July.

Waiver Requests

• No Waiver Request was submitted

Critical Observing Condition Constraints

• No Critical Observing Condition Constraints are required.

Time-Critical Aspects

• No Time-Critical Aspects are required.

Special Execution Requirements

• ---(Empty)---

Special Calibration Information

• We added Telluric standards, one for each targets. In the Name we put
   the object reference.

ToO Information

• ---(Empty)---

ToO Activators List

• ---(Empty)---

Do the README file and the instrument comments of the telluric stars
 OBs include the required S/N/pixel of the spectrum of the telluric star, its spectral
 type and allowed spectral range?

• YES

Do any OBs include wavelength or flatfield calibrations?

• YES

If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
 files to your OBs?

• YES

If the slit viewer guide star is different from the target, are the RA
 and DEC offsets accurate to within 0.05 arcsec and do they take into account the
 relative proper motion between the two objects?

• YES

If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first for objects
 at similar RA, did you make use of the User Priority field in the OBs?

• YES