README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_82048300
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This is a continuing NACO program to monitor the orbital motion of Eps
Indi Ba,Bb, the nearest known binary brown dwarf system. The separation was 0.732
arcsec at PA=137 degrees E of N in August 2003. The system also has a very high
proper motion of 4.7 arcsec/yr. Observations have been made in P73-P81: 2 further
epochs are needed in P82, spaced roughly by 4-6 weeks during the period. The N90C10
dichroic is used in order to ensure good AO correction using the IR WFS on the brighter
of the two T dwarfs, Eps Indi Ba, which has an H band magnitude of 11.51. The NACO
S13 camera is used to get the best possible spatial resolution and sampling, and
thus the most accurate astrometry. Images are taken in each of the J, H, and Ks
filters to help reduce systematic errors in the astrometry and to look for evidence
of photometric and colour variability in the T dwarfs. In each filter, a total of
1 minute integration time is taken at each of 5 dithered positions on the detector.
A corresponding OB must then be executed on HD208371/2, in order to calibrate the
NACO image scale and position angle. Care must be taken to ensure that both stars
in the HD208371/2 binary are in the NACO science field.
Eps Indi B moves at 4.7 arcsec/yr: the 1999 epoch 2MASS finding chart shows its
predicted 2009.0 epoch position.
Waiver Requests
381.C-0417A.01.WAV: waiver granted 14/07/08
Request for extension to Phase 2 submission deadline until August 15 2008
381.C-0417A.02.WAV: waiver granted 14/07/08
The DIT/NDIT values for our observations should be changed by the SM astronomer
at the time of the observations, in order to ensure that the sources do not saturate
while good S/N is delivered. The product DIT x NDIT should remain constant.
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Observations should be carried in seeing of 0.6 arcsec or better to separate
two sources and obtain accurate relative positions. All efforts made to optimise
the AO system would be greatly appreciated: the better the final AO-corrected image
resolution, the better the astrometry.
Clear conditions required for relative photometric measurements.
No strong requirements on lunar illumination or distance of moon from target.
Time-Critical Aspects
The relative orbit of Eps Indi Ba,Bb should be measured twice during P82,
at times which are sensibly separated. We have imposed 6 week long time windows
on each of the observations (Epoch 1: Sep 15 - Nov 30; Epoch 2: Nov 15 - Dec 31)
within the time that Eps Indi B is available in P82 (i.e. ~ Oct 01 - Dec 31). These
windows overlap by 2 weeks in order to provide flexibility (e.g. if there is a long
period of bad weather in the first window, we'd still like some data even if a bit
late), but it makes no sense to take the 2 epochs closer than (say) 3-4 weeks apart
in P82: a well-spaced set of observations along the binary orbit provides more accurate
results. Thus please try and space the two epochs as well as possible, within the
usual constraints.
Special Execution Requirements
Nominal values of DIT=10 secs and NDIT=6 have been specified for the Eps
Indi B observations, but we ask the SM observer to change DIT and NDIT to ensure
well-exposed (i.e. high S/N) but not saturated images. If this adjustment is made
in the H band, the same values of DIT/NDIT should also be ok for J and Ks (taken
in the same OB). The product of DIT and NDIT should remain fixed at 1 minute. The
same should be done for the astrometric calibrator (HD208371/HD208372) to ensure
that both stars are well-exposed but not saturated. The nominal values are DIT=1
sec, NDIT=15, a total of 15 seconds. A waiver has been granted to allow this exception.
Special Calibration Information
Each time Eps Indi B is observed, the astrometric calibrator binary (HD208371/2)
MUST BE OBSERVED immediately before or after, without any adjustment of the NACO
instrument and mounting.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The coordinate given for the calibrator is for the southernmost
star in the binary, HD208272, which is the WFS star. Once it is acquired, the field
MUST BE OFFSET TO THE NORTH, to ensure both stars in the binary are visible in the
NACO FOV simultaneously.
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:27 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org