README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_81506200
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
If possible we request observations as close to transit as possible.
We requested a waiver to saturate the detector heavily - this request was granted
as NACO 281.D-5062A.01.WAV
We are looking to verify the existence of very faint extended structure emanating
from the central star. We expect the star to saturate very heavily (by a factor
of 80) and the ghost images and latent images to remain several frames on.
We request that both of the NACO_img_acq_MoveToPixel sequences will position the
central star on pixel 512, 512.
The two OBs comprising this programme are identical except for their position angles
on the sky, which are +15 and -15 degrees.
In case of any queries please don't hesitate to phone Paul Hirst (+1 808 974 2630
[office] or +1 808 987 2084 [mobile] on Hawaii time-zone) or Katherine Blundell
(+44 1865 273308 [office] or +44 7930 240293 [mobile] on UK time-zone). Our email
addresses are: phirst@gemini.edu and kmb@astro.ox.ac.uk.
Thank you very much.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:26 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org