README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_81504600
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
Information on target and AO TTS:
OB names R(TTS) target separation comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SINS_BX610_LGSAO_DDT81-# 18.0 K=19.2 58 arcsec H_alpha: line at 2.107um
integrated flux ~2e-16 erg/s/cm2
major axis FWHM ~ 1.3"
We are using an "on-source dithering" strategy (cf. below), which requires very
accurate blind offset to the target, to a few pixels at the 100mas scale employed.
We would like to verify with the data of the first OB that the source positioning
is as accurate as it should be.
We therefore wish to request that the OB SINS_BX610_LGSAO_DDT81-0 is first put in
the observing queue, and that the subsequent OBs (SINS_BX610_LGSAO_DDT81-1 to -5)
are queued after we have verified the positioning from the data of the first OB.
The main characteristics of the observations are as follows.
- The PA is set to 20 deg for the target, Q2343-BX610, primarily for scientific
reasons
and to allow for on-source dithering, as well as to ensure the tip-tilt reference
falls within the Field Selector field of view (FOV). THIS PA SHOULD NOT BE MODIFIED.
- OBs are named after the target, with "-0", "-1", "-2", etc. appended for different
OBs.
- The priority among the OBs is set using the priority flag in the templates, and
the
order is reflected in the "-#" used in the OB names.
- The brightest spectral feature of the target is H_alpha in emission;
the observed wavelength, integrated flux, and size in H_alpha are thus
given in the table above.
- We are using the 100mas scale, with FOV of 3.2"x3.2".
The target is extended mostly in one direction (PA ~ 20 deg). This morphology
is best seen in HST/NICMOS imaging at a resolution of ~0.2" (included in the
finding charts). The target size enables an "on-source dithering" strategy,
in which two successive exposures are offset along E-W by about 1/2 the 3.2"x3.2"
FOV (i.e., about 1.5") for pairwise sky subtraction. Small jitters about the
two
main dithering positions are used to minimize the number of redundant positions.
We would like to note that for this target, the only suitable tip-tilt source (TTS)
available is a compact but rather faint galaxy. We are aware of the possible limitations
this could have on the AO performance. Our experience from the SINFONI GTO visitor
runs
using AO in LGS mode with TTS of similar magnitude and at comparable distances from
the
science targets was successful and provided effective angular resolution of 0.15"-0.3",
which still meets our scientific requirements.
We are thus confident that these observations can be carried out, and if the acquisition
presents some difficulties, we would like to kindly ask the observers to do their
best,
or to contact the P.I. if needed.
Remarks on the finding charts:
- Three finding charts are provided:
(1) SINFONI_Q2343-BX610_LGS_fchart1.jpg: has wider FOV; a large and
a small black square show regions 1' x 1' and 8" x 8" centered on the target;
the TTS is labeled "R1". The larger dashed rectangle shows the Strap Field
Selector FOV of the AO system.
(2) SINFONI_Q2343-BX610_LGS_fchart2.jpg: is zoomed in on the target, with the
large and small solid-line squares showing regions of 8" x 8" and 3.2" x 3.2"
centered on the target. In addition, two dashed-line squares show the outline
of the two main dithering positions for Q2343-BX610.
(3) SINFONI_Q2343-BX610_LGS_fchart3.jpg: similar to above zoomed chart but based
on much higher resolution HST/NICMOS imaging. This clearly shows why the
PA = 20 deg is crucial for our target.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Transparency constraints:
- For all OBs, CLEAR sky transparency conditions is acceptable, as specified
in the proposal.
Moon constraints:
- Conforming to our proposal, there is no constraint on lunar phase and so
the illumination is set to 1.0.
- The TTS is faint (V >~ 16), however, so we have set the constraint for
moon distance to 50 degrees
(following recommendations from the ESO SINFONI P2PP Web pages
http://www.eso.org/observing/p2pp/SINFONI/SINFONI-P2PP.html#Requirements)
Seeing constraints:
- Seeing <= 0.6", as specified in the proposal.
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
As we explain in the General Description, we are using an "on-source dithering"
strategy.
This requires very accurate blind offset to the target, to a few pixels at the 100mas
scale employed. We would like to verify with the data of the first OB that the
source
positioning is as accurate as it should be.
We therefore wish to request that the OB SINS_BX610_LGSAO_DDT81-0 is first put in
the
observing queue, and that the subsequent OBs (SINS_BX610_LGSAO_DDT81-1 to -5) are
queued
after we have verified the positioning from the data of the first OB.
The PA = 20 deg is necessary and essential for our target Q2343-BX610,
and should not be modified without approval from the PI.
We have also noted in the General Description that the TTS is rather faint.
While from our experience during previous SINFONI GTO runs we are confident the
observations can be carried out and meet our scientific requirements, please do
not hesitate to contact the PI in case of difficulties.
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate the magnitude of the brightest object in the field in
each SINFONI OB?
If you are using the AO: Did you indicate for every OB the magnitude
of the guide star, and its distance to the target (if any)?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you use the provided StandardStar
templates?
If you are using a specific offset pattern or position angle: did you
check carefully the definition in the manual?
Did you make really sure that none of your OBs ever saturates the detector?
If you are using the AO: did you enter the correct Strehl Ratio (on-axis,
K-band) AND the seeing value in the constraint set?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:26 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org