README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_80062900
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This is an ISAAC near-IR spectroscopic followup to a WFCAM narrowband
survey for H-alpha emitters at z=2.23 in the COSMOS field. These observations consist
of faint (K=18-19) targets selected with narrowband excess flux at 2.121um, and
we aim to identify emission lines to confirm the narrowband selection.
Due to the faint nature of the targets, in all cases we target a nearby bright acquistion
object and then set PA and offset to target, keeping the reference on the slit to
help with identification of the science target in the 2D spectrum. This has been
a strategy that has been useful in the past. The reference objects have been chosen
to be near and as stellar like as possible. They generally have K=15-16 (Vega).
All target coordinates refer to the reference object, and the offset is to the science
target in the sense that east and north are positive. The PA should be set such
that the reference and target remain on the slit.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you use the provided StandardStar
templates ?
If you are using a specific offset pattern or position angle, did you
check carefully the definition in the manual ?
If you are doing spectroscopy, did you draw the slit on the Finding Charts
?
Did you enter the magnitude of the brightest star in the field-of-view
in the 'Instrument Comments' field of each OB ?
If you use the MoveToPixel acquisition, have you given clear instructions
on the FC and in the OB comment section as to how the field should be centered ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:22 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org