README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_80055700
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
We propose to obtain deep near-infrared spectroscopic observations with
the integrated field instrument SPIFFI using laser guide-star adaptive optics to
study the spatially resolved internal kinematics of the brightest UCD in the Fornax
galaxy cluster. The proposed data will have enough spatial coverage and high S/N
to investigate whether the target UCD shows any kinematic anisotropies, such as
rotation and tidal features. If distinct tidal features are detected this would
strongly suggest a formation scenario that includes galaxy stripping processes and
would be a major leap forward in our understanding of the formation and evolution
of these enigmatic ultra-compact objects.
The observations will be conducted with the K-band grating that provides a resolution
of R=4000 over the wavelength range 1.95 - 2.45 mu. The UCD has a central surface
brightness of mu_K ~ 13 mag/arcsec^2 and an effective radius of ~0.1 arcsec. We
will probe the velocity field down to a surface brightness of mu_K ~ 16.5 mag (out
to ~0.8 arcsec radius) with a S/N >~ 20 at 2.18 mu, and bin the spectra radially
and azimuthaly out to ~4.5 arcsec. The S/N limit corresponds to a radial velocity
resolution of $10-20$ km/s, a value that is expected to be sufficient to probe tidal
features and residual rotation. We will use the laser guide star mode for our observations,
with the tip-tilt star S033223110268 (GSC2.2) that has a luminosity R=16.17 mag
with B-R=0.8 mag and is located 8.5 arcsec away from the target object. To minimize
the effects of dark current, thermal background, and remnant effects, as well as
minimize the overhead we adopt 150 second sub-integrations: INT = NDIT x DIT = 50
x 150 seconds, split into 2 OBs. The sub-integrations will be dithered by 0.5 arcsec
offsets. We will obtain one standard star spectrum of a K0 giant with the same instrument
setup and under similar observing conditions as the science observations to assure
a robust velocity dispersion analysis.
Waiver Requests
Requestor: puziat@nrc.ca
WaiverID: 380.B-0557A.01
Sent: 08/02/07 09:27:20 CET
Our program (380.B-0557) would significantly benefit from an override of the maximum
execution time per OB.
If the OBs are prepared according to the p2pp rule, < 1hr05m execution time per
OB, we find:
integration time execution time
02:48:00.000 06:06:24.000 (46% open-shutter time).
With only one split, i.e. 2 OBs, we would reduce the overhead to
integration time execution time
04:08:00.000 05:57:20.000 (70% open-shutter time)
We request the override of the maximum OB execution time rule.
==
Approved: 08/02/07 16:10:03 CET
The submission of OBs with >1hr execution time was approved by Dr. Mario van
den Ancker.
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate the magnitude of the brightest object in the field in
each SINFONI OB?
If you are using the AO: Did you indicate for every OB the magnitude
of the guide star, and its distance to the target (if any)?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you use the provided StandardStar
templates?
If you are using a specific offset pattern or position angle: did you
check carefully the definition in the manual?
Did you make really sure that none of your OBs ever saturates the detector?
If you are using the AO: did you enter the correct Strehl Ratio (on-axis,
K-band) AND the seeing value in the constraint set?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:21 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org