README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_80050700
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
1) The aim is to determine the geometry of the near-infrared excess observed
in three massive young stellar objects: G203, G310, G332. AMBER should resolve the
c continuum of our 3 targets in the HK-band. The targets have K-band magnitudes
of 4.9, 4.9 and 5.9. What the correlated K-magnitude is, is not known. The stars
are very red with H-K values of 3. It could therefore be difficult to get fringes
in H-band. Two of three targets (G310, G332) are observable in March, the third
target G203 for the full period of CYCLE80.
2) Interferometric calibrator stars have been chosen using Calvin and ASPRO. Their
magnitudes are within 1 K-magnitude brighter than target object, and chosen to be
unresolved. Finding a suitable calibration star for the target G332 (K=5.9) was
quite difficult. CalVin only returns
relatively bright stars.
TARGET calib_NAME RA DEC V K sp.type diameter Source of diameter Viscalc
G203 HD 63838 07:50:53.43 00:04:46.40 6.4 3.5 K2III 0.96
Calvin M04 OK
G310 HD 109963 12:39:12.4199 -49:03:59.090 7.7 4.1 K3III 0.79 Calvin M04
OK
G332 HD 129858 14:46:28.9936 -47:26:28.017 5.7 5.5 A1V 0.52 ASPRO spectro-photometry
OK
3)Coude guide:
Target stars are invisible in the V-band! Coude guide stars are well within 57.5"
from target.
target coude guide catalogue Fmag (R) Kmag distance remarks
G203 N825025022 GSC2.3.2 16.2 11.9 48" strongly reddened
star. One other bright star could be used for guiding. It is found
at 06:41:09.09 +09:30:09.6 (d~43").
It is a periodic variable, which can be brighter
than V=16.2
Important note on G203: the target has an optically visible extended nebula.
The science target G203 may therefore be used as a coude guide star, if the off-axis
coude guide star doesn't work (as it didn't last december 2007).
G310 S7MR070952 GSC2.3.2 14.5 11.4 12"
G332 S8TB006948 GSC2.3.2 13.5 11.2 28"
4) Baselines, and observations risk spread related to UV coverage:
UV-coverage: G203 : 4 observations per U1-U3-U4 configuration -> 12 UV points
G310 : 3 observations per U1-U3-U4 configuration -> 9 UV points
G332 : 2 observations per U1-U3-U4 configuration -> 6 UV points
NOTE: Observations can also be executed with U1-U2-U4
5) Finding charts. As the three target stars are invisible in V-band! We have made
the finding charts in J-band. In J-band G332 is of 15th
magnitude and not very well visible, whereas G203 and G310 are bright in J.
6) TARGET VISIBILITIES in the SCI_* OBs :
We do not know the correlated magnitude of the targest, and to avoid OB error we
have put it to an arbitrary value of 0.2.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
Interferometric calibrator stars have been chosen using ASPRO. The magnitudes
are within 1 K-magnitude brighter than target object, and chosen to be unresolved.
TARGET calib_NAME RA DEC V K sp.type UD-VK UD-VR UD-BV Source of diameter
Viscalc
G203 HD 50371 06:53:22.4008 +10:59:47.940 6.3 4.1 K0III 0.760 0.898 0.775 spectro-photometry
(I/280) OK
G310 HD 121280 13:56:04.5929 -55:57:10.999 6.8 4.6 K0III 0.597 0.719 0.597
spectro-photometry (I/280) OK
G332 HD 146481 16:19:20.8606 -54:30:48.943 7.2 5.5 G4V 0.378 0.378 0.335 spectro-photometry
(I/280) OK
The source catalogue (vizier I/280) is Kharchenko et al. 2001 "The all-sky catalogue
of 2.5million stars"
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Do you use the same DIT for pairs of science target and associated calibrator?
Are the magnitudes of science target and calibrator within +/- 1 mag
?
Did you verify that your coordinates are as accurate as possible (2Mass
coordinates recommended) and that they include proper motions if available ?
Did you specify the LST range of the calibrators such that they cover
the range from 30 min before the start of the LST range of the science target to
30 min after the end of the LST range of the science target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:21 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org