README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_80038000

Principal Investigator Email Address

• beuther@mpia.de

Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)

• 2 hours 59 minutes and 21 seconds.

General Description

• This project aims at observing the massive accretion disks around Orion-BM
   and Orion-n in the CO fundamental band at 4.6mum. Both sources have to be observed
   in two spectral setups to cover the whole fundamental band. To achieve the necessary
   S/N ratio, two OBs have to be executed for Orion-n (SCI_ori-n-1 & SCI_ori-n-2)
   and one OB for Orion-BN (SCI_ori-bn). Each science OB has a corresponding calibration
   OB (CAL_*) as described in each OB.

Waiver Requests

• No Waiver Request was submitted

Critical Observing Condition Constraints

• We require a clear sky, a seing of 1.0 and an airmass better than 1.5.

Time-Critical Aspects

• There are no time-critical aspects.

Special Execution Requirements

• Each Science OB has a corresponding calibration ob as outlined in the
   OBs themselves. The oreder which to be observed first is left to the operators.

Special Calibration Information

• Each Science OB has a corresponding calibration ob as outlined in the
   OBs themselves. The oreder which to be observed first is left to the operators.

ToO Information

• ---(Empty)---

ToO Activators List

• ---(Empty)---

Do the README file and the instrument comments of the telluric stars
 OBs include the required S/N/pixel of the spectrum of the telluric star, its spectral
 type and allowed spectral range?

• YES

Do any OBs include wavelength or flatfield calibrations?

• N/A

If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
 files to your OBs?

• N/A

If the slit viewer guide star is different from the target, are the RA
 and DEC offsets accurate to within 0.05 arcsec and do they take into account the
 relative proper motion between the two objects?

• N/A

If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first for objects
 at similar RA, did you make use of the User Priority field in the OBs?

• N/A