README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_80033301
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This 1hr OB is submitted as RRM compensation time for the UVES visitor
program
080.D-0333(A). We request a 3005s observation of star CS22876-032
(v=12.84) with the same setup used in the visitor run:
Image Slicer #3 (IS#3:high resolution is required); UVES red arm (we need both the
Mg b line at ~5184A and the Li resonance line at ~6708A).
Template adopted: UVES_red_acq_imsl and UVES_red_obs_exp.
As we need IS#3 observations, the slit position is not indicated in the finding
chart.
We aim at a S/N~133@6710A (i.e. at the Li resonance line).
Grey time is requested as in the proposal,
0.4 of fractional moon illumination is the average FLI in
the 4 days awarded for the visitor run (16-19 October).
Gray time is required as we are looking for a signal corresponding to
1/700 of the light of the star at the wavelength 6707.8A.
This corresponds to a magnitude of mV 19-20 for the sky for a mV = 13 star.
Therefore we need a grey sky.
Please, check the *Image Slicer Alignment* before the observations:
during our first observing night the IS was found not aligned.
Check also the exposure meter during the observation.
When observing the target at +-2HA a significant drift of the object
was noted at the end of the exposure:
a cut through the frame revealed several times a not centered slicer profile.
Therefore, if you notice that the counts are constantly decreasing in the
exp meter during the observation then apply an offset to the
telescope to recover the higher counts. Please, check the centering
of the slicer profile on the frame after the observation and the S/N achieved
around 6710A.
Note, that the submitted OB is already cached on the mountain with
the same name (but a different exposure time).
When importing the OB in the p2pp I had the following warning
which should not be relevant (observation were performed
from OBs created with the same version of the p2pp):
CS22876-032.obx was successfully imported but has the following warnings
Warning the following parameters were not imported for UVES_red_acq_imsl
TEL.TARG.ADDVELALPHA
TEL.TARG.ADDVELDELTA
Please, send any observation related communication to both the PI
(Jonay.Gonzalez-Hernandez@obspm.fr) and to Lorenzo Monaco (lmonaco@eso.org).
Thank you!
ciao, Lorenzo
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Gray time is required. Please, check (1) the IS#3 alignment and
(2) the exposure meter during the exposure.
When observing the target at +-2HA a significant drift of the object
was noted at the end of the exposure:
a cut through the frame revealed several times a not centered slicer profile.
Therefore, if you notice that the counts are constantly decreasing in the
exp meter during the observation then apply an offset to the
telescope to recover the higher counts. Please, check the centering
of the slicer profile on the frame after the observation and the S/N achieved
around 6710A.
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you specified the S/N ratio at given wavelength in the User Comments
field of each OB?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you need secondary guiding, are there suitable objects within 30 arcsec
from your target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:21 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org