README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_79506400
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This programme aims at obtaining NACO photometry in three NB filters and
H band spectroscopy of a newly detected companion to the bright star Achernar. The
flux from this companion is expected to be around 2% of the flux of Achernar itself
in all bands, and it is located at an angular distance of 0.2-0.3". All three OBs
should be executed together (total time 1.0 hour) in the following sequence: 1-"Achernar",
2-"Achernar-B-Spectro", 3-"PSF_DeltaPhe". Although this is not mandatory, this will
save an AO acquisition time between the first and the second OB.
- Imaging: Due to the brightness of Achernar and its PSF calibrator, Delta Phe,
all imaging observations are done in narrow band filters + neutral density. The
"Achernar" abd "PSF_DeltaPhe" OBs should be executed in this order one after the
other. Their execution should not present any particular difficulty, and the exposure
times have been chosen to allow a large margin before saturation. We have only two
offset positions as we do not need an accurate sky subtraction. Our PSF calibrator
is also a spectrophotometric standard and therefore will provide us the necessary
zero points for our filters.
- Spectroscopy: The exact position of the companion is not known as its orbital
parameters have not been derived yet. However, an acquisition image obtained in
June 2007 with NACO for another programme shows the companion at an approximate
relative position of 90mas West and 190mas North from Achernar, moving apparently
towards East from last year. The companion should be detectable visually on the
acquisition image of Achernar using adapted level cuts to display the raw image.
We set the OB for direct acquisition (zero offset in the acq template).
*** The night astronomer should check already in the imaging acquisition if the
companion is detected. *** If not, (s)he should abort the execution and to contact
USD, so that we can modify the spectroscopy OB to blindly offset from the reference
star. The orientation of the slit should be East-West, hence the 90 degree position
angle on sky specified in the acquisition template.
The brightest objects in our fields are Achernar (V=0.5, K=0.9) and Delta Phe (V=4.0,
K=1.7).
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:20 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org