README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_79081300

Principal Investigator Email Address

• henrik.hartman@astro.lu.se

Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)

• 9:59:56

General Description

• This is a spectroscopic run, observing Eta Carinae and its nebulosity
   in a number of wavelength regions. The slit is aligned in the same way for all settings.
   In addition, a telluric star is obererved.
  
  Identification of target: Eta Carinae is an extended object (about 20"). The science
   target is the central star.
  The central star is the most intense part on which the slit should be aligned. The
   other parts of the nebula will then also be covered when the slit is oriented according
   to the specifications.
  
  The required S/N for the telluric star is 70. 
  The given telluric star has SpTyp B1.5V, and an allowed spectral range is B0-B5.

Waiver Requests

• No Waiver Request was submitted

Critical Observing Condition Constraints

• No critical observing conditions apply

Time-Critical Aspects

• No time-critical aspects

Special Execution Requirements

• ---(Empty)---

Special Calibration Information

• Each science OB (named: "Eta Carinae - grid xy") 
  is to be followed by the corresponding telluric star OB with simiar OB name: "cal_Telluric
   - grid xy"

ToO Information

• ---(Empty)---

ToO Activators List

• ---(Empty)---

Do the README file and the instrument comments of the telluric stars
 OBs include the required S/N/pixel of the spectrum of the telluric star, its spectral
 type and allowed spectral range?

• YES

Do any OBs include wavelength or flatfield calibrations?

• YES

If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
 files to your OBs?

• N/A

If the slit viewer guide star is different from the target, are the RA
 and DEC offsets accurate to within 0.05 arcsec and do they take into account the
 relative proper motion between the two objects?

• N/A

If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first for objects
 at similar RA, did you make use of the User Priority field in the OBs?

• YES