README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_79020400
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
We would like observe the binary HD113449 with AMBER in the low-resolution
mode.
The separtion of the binary is so small that it will be resolved only with AMBER
(approx 40 mas). The orbital period is 215 days. The aim is to determine the visual
orbit of the binary.
Thus, the two observation should be separted by several month so that we get two
different orbital phases. For example, if one observation is in April and one in
June would be perfect.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
For AMBER observations, a seeing of 1.2 arcsec or better is prefered,
so that the AO-system works. The observation can also be carried out under conditions
worse than that if the AO-loop can be closed.
Time-Critical Aspects
The two observations of the HD113449 should be separted by several month,
because the orbital period of the binary is 215 days. It would be ideal if one observation
is taken in April, and the other in June. The larger the separtion, the better.
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:18 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org