README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_78079100
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
Dear observer
This is a "simple" observing program, aimed at obtaining multiple and dithered images
of the outer parts of the Small Magellanic Cloud galaxy. Our analysis will be both
photometric and astrometric.
We do not need photometric conditions, however we seek good quality imaging, in
particular, the stars need to be well-centered (and not allungated) so as to enable
an astrometric comparison with
a previous 2001 epoch observations. We therefore kindly ask that the focusing is
done before taking the images.
In brief, we intend to observe 2 adjacent SMC fields as follows:
(A) Field 1= This field has the HIGHEST PRIORITY: we intend to obtain
1) 16 images through the R filter
2) 3 images through the Washington M filter
3) 3 images through the Washington DDO51 filter
The 16 R images were divided in 2 OBs so as not to exceed the 1 hour limit.
(B) Field 2= This field has the SECOND PRIORITY: we intend to obtain
1) 3 images in the B filter
2) 3 images in the R filter
3) 3 images in Washington M filter
4) 3 images in Washington DDO51 filter
All OBs for Field 1 should be done before attempting Field 2.
We made different OBs for different filters so as to make the program execuation
flexibale.
We have included Sky Flat-Field OBs for the Washington-M and 513/15 filters since
these
are not standard filters. Waiver was sent to be sure that the these extra flats
will not be
charged from our allocated time, and we recieved a positive answer.
Waiver Requests
We have asked the employment of two non-standard filters (Washington M
and DDO51). We sent a waiver
to make sure that the flat-fields of these filters would not be charged from our
allocated time.
We recieved a positive answer (see below).
--------------------------------------
Phase 2 Waiver Request 078.D-0791A.01
Fri, July 21, 2006 4:34 pm
Dear Dr. Momany,
I am pleased to let you know that the requested change in filters is
granted. Indeed, the flats needed, which are not a part of the
calibration plan, are not charged against the time allocation.
Best regards,
Fernando Comeron
ESO User Support Department
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
We do NOT need the night to be photometric.
It is enough that it is CLEAR.
Given the coordinates of our target field, we relaxed our seeing observing
constraint to 1.4 arcsec, and the airmass to 1.7.
However, it remains important that the stars are well-focused.
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
No aditional calibrations are required.
Overall, for our observations we need standard calibrations:
1) 5 Bias images.
2) 5 flat-fields images with good S/N (around 25000).
The filters we intend to use are the B, R, Washington M, and Washington DDO51 (513/37
in the WFI filter list).
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you set 'New Preset' flag in all acquisition templates to 'True'?
Have all your submitted OBs the same filter for the acquisition template
and for the first science template?
Did you combine calibration templates with science templates for any
OB?
Did you combine imaging and spectroscopic templates for any OB?
Did you submit any Focus template?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:17 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org