README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_78075002
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
Dust evolution in Herbig Be stars.
We intend to determine the disk mineralogy, structure and evolution of Herbig Be
stars. Most of these massive stars are still shrouded in their natal clouds and
other nebulosity. This is why the high spatial resolution spectroscopic data of
VISIR is vital in order to diffentiate the mineralogy of the disks from that of
their surroundings as observed in the bigger beam of ISO and Spitzer. Subsequently
we will compare the disk structure and composition to those of the lower mass Herbig
Ae and T Tauri stars for which comprensive studies have been completed. This observing
run concerns the imaging of the spatial distribution of the mid-IR emission.
*)Target Identification
All finding charts are K-band 2MASS images and thus at a diffent wavelength. Most
targets will be straight forward, because we expect them to be the brightest point
source in the FOV. Some targets will contain nebulosity or even fragmented cores.
For the pre-imaging please place the brightest nucleus in the center of the chip.
*)Proper motion
The proper motion of all targets is less than 0.05"/yr and no ephemeris files are
needed.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
*)Execution requirements
We selected 30" parallel chop-nodding to clearly discern the environment of the
objects. Use of the rotator is made for most sources and the chopping-angle is always
chosen equal to the rotation-angle.
Note to the telescope operator:
Please observe a guide star that remains in the field with this chop-nod sequence.
*)Note 2007-03-06 !
In an attempt to eliminate the artifacts on the top and bottom of bright sources
we have added imaging OBs which contain rotations of 90 degrees with respect to
the previous images. Another way to avoid the artifacts would be to lower the DIT,
as we believe it is a saturation effect. So we would like to request to set the
wheather flag one step lower than usual.
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If the provided finding chart is at a different wavelength than the observations,
did you clearly describe in the README file how to identify the target?
Did you specify a guide star brighter than V=12mag within a field of
r=5arcmin around the science target?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:17 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org