README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_78059900
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
We aim to acquire high resolution imaging in L' of two compact and crowded
star forming regions (core-A and core-B) in NGC2264. To better deconvolve the sources
in our subsequent analysis of the data, we are also including a short OB for a PSF
source. The PSF OB is associated with the science OB naco_coreA. We realize that
our images will have anisoplanatism since our references soures are more distant
than 20" from their respective targets, however we still think it is useful to obtain
data of a PSF star for our subsequent analysis of core-A.
Each OB submitted has its own reference sources, indicated in the associated finding
charts. For each OB submitted, we have attached two finding charts: one at 3.6 microns
and one at band Ks. We have additionally included in the finding charts the value
of the brightest star in the field of view in L', as well as the magnitudes of the
reference stars in Ks (since we are using the IR wavefront sensor). The total integration
time for the (078.C-0599-A) run is 1 hour, 59 minutes and 40 seconds, as given by
the execution time report. The time was distributed in the following manner:
naco_coreA - exp. time =21:00.000 - exec. time = 51:27.000
naco_coreB - exp. time = 18:23.000 - exec. time = 50:53.000
PSF_NGC2264_naco - exp. time = 02:11.000 - exec. time = 17:41.000
thanks
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
The observing priority of the OBs in the NACO run A are as follows:
1 - naco_coreA
2 - PSF_NGC2264_naco
3 - naco_coreB
We do not require that all three OBs be observed consecutively, although it would
be useful to have them observed in the same night for calibration purposes. The
PSF OB PSF_NGV2264_naco is associated with the science OB naco_coreA.
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Each OB has its own set of reference stars, labeled independently. We
have included both the 2MASS catalogue IDs and the names we have assigned them in
the finding charts attached. Note that we included two finding charts for each OB,
one in 3.6 microns while the other is based on a 2MASS Ks image.
The science OB naco_coreA is associated with the PSF OB PSF_NGC2264_naco.
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:16 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org