README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_77503100
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This program aims at fully characterize and calibrate the NB filter ESO#865,
centered on the Ca H+K lines. This is a preliminary step towards the execution of
a pure photometric survey for the detection of metal poor stars ([Fe/H]<-3.0)
in the galactic halo. In fact, this filter used in combination with SDSS ugriz photometry
will allow to have a photometric determination of stars metallicity.
However, the full use of filter ESO#865 is completely hampered by lack of a proper
photometric calibration.
We therefore will observe a 1square degree field on SDSS field and a large sample
of slocan standards. Primary star will be BD+174708 since it is one of the 3 spectro-photometric
standards of SDSS and HST/ACS.
Observations should be performed under photometric conditions.
All standards are taken from Smith et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2121
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you set 'New Preset' flag in all acquisition templates to 'True'?
Have all your submitted OBs the same filter for the acquisition template
and for the first science template?
Did you combine calibration templates with science templates for any
OB?
Did you combine imaging and spectroscopic templates for any OB?
Did you submit any Focus template?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:14 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org