README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_77501402
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
These are observations to fill in UV-points missed during a large service/visitor
mode run during Oct/Nov 2005. The target has been observed many times before with
MIDI and target acquisition and fringe finding/tracking are not difficult, although
the target is below the official MIDI service mode limit in correlated flux for
GRISM mode. It is important to
get the source as early as possible after it rises above the 30 degree limit. This
occurs at HA=-3h46m or LST ~22h55m. The target is a spiral seyfert galaxy with
a bright
AGN core. There are two finding charts: N.jpg shows a Sky Survey image of the galaxy
with surrounding stars. NGC1068acqMIDI.jpg shows the AGN nucleus as seen through
the
MIDI acquisition images with the N8.7 filter.
The calibrator has been observed many times before and is easy to acquire and track.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:14 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org