README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_77019800
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
Observations of Dwarf Galaxies near the Local Group Boundary.
Refining the distance estimates using the TRGB.
All the fields of the same object have been offset already and are intended to avoid
any interchip gap. I have selected the acquisition mode "MovetoGap" to do this assuming
that is correct. Rather than "MovetoPixel" because I could not find documentation
on either option, so have selected the former.
If you find this is not the case (ie the object falls on the gap), please feel free
to adjust the pointing to ensure that the dwarf galaxy is in a clear part of the
array and away from chip edges. Each dither within the OB is designed to move the
galaxy around the array ensuring that any part that may have been in a gap in one
exposure is not in the next. If the galaxy moves off the array we have accidently
done so and it should be moved back on. Each offset maintains an overlap with the
previous set of exposures and in most cases consists of a only a shift in DEC.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you set 'New Preset' flag in all acquisition templates to 'True'?
Have all your submitted OBs the same filter for the acquisition template
and for the first science template?
Did you combine calibration templates with science templates for any
OB?
Did you combine imaging and spectroscopic templates for any OB?
Did you submit any Focus template?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:12 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org