README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_76072000
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This is a spectroscopic programme with NACO for the spiral galaxy NGC3705.
We will keep in the 86mas slit both the AO-star and the target, the galaxy nucleus.
This will allow us to closely monitor the AO-performance.
The provided position angle of the slit was derived from HST images,
and if the reference star is in the slit so should the nucleus of the galaxy.
Yet it this PA may need to be adjusted.
It is essential for this program that the slit is well centered on the
galaxy. Also based on previous NACO run, we know that NGC3705 has a
well defined center and regular nuclear isophotes of elliptical shape,
so centering should not be difficult.
In any case it will be essential for us to reconstruct a posteriori
the position of the slit, so we request the slit-illuminated image to
be saved. Furthermore, should any of the spectroscopic OBs
be executed one after one other, please make sure that the slit is
still centered on the galaxy before starting a new ABBA sequence.
In our past Visitor Mode p72 and p74 run we have noticed that the
slit position could drift of 1-1.5 pixel over 1h.
The PA seemed stable, though.
After the very first AB-cycle, please check that the neither the galaxy
nor the star fall too close to the border of the chip when nodding, and
that they do not overlap in the A-B image. This should not happen if
initially the slit center is between the galaxy and the AO star.
We have provided also 3 calibration OBs, to obtain special telluric
standards, as we expect that our observations are likely to be carried out
in 3 nights.
Should our programme be executed over a longer period of time we will
rely on the standard telluric taken during the night calibration plan.
Could you only be so kind to please note the FWHM of your telluric
stars once the AO-loop is close and before placing the slit.
It will be important to know how this compares with the slit-width.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
Special Execution Requirements
Just a suggestion to obtain a more efficient AO-correction.
During our last VISITOR mode P74 run, we have found that by starting with
as slightly overestimating brightness of the AO star, it is possible
to iterate and obtain a better configuration.
Special Calibration Information
To analyse our extended-source spectroscopic observations, the
telluric standard stars need to be observed in a fashion that
closely mimick our science observations. In particular we
need the slit width to be uniformly illuminated by the light of the
telluric star. This will be achieved with the NACO_spec_obs_GenericOffset
template, when keeping the tellutic star in the slit during a "sky" observation
which by default will have the AO-loop open.
We have added 3 telluric calibration observing blocks, estimating that our
programme can be carried out in 3 different nights. This template should be
observed shortly after NGC3705 (~30-45min) when with an airmass of z=1.3 it
will parallell best the typical airmass of the NGC3705 observations (1.25-1.4)
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:11 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org