README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_75504802
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
This DDT program aims at measuring directly the diameter of the largest
TNO known to date (2004 UB313) and detect its satellite. This is a time critical
program which must be executed on the night of Sunday November 13, when the separation
between the TNO and the appulse star is minimum (16").
- OB 2003UB313-NACO uses a nearby star (G0 H=10.6) to lock the AO system. Acquisition
is done on the star, then we offset to the field of the TNO. The last template goes
back to the AO star in order to calibrate the AO performances.
- OB CAL_NGC288_68 (star:G6 H=11): This OB is used to calibrate the performance
of the AO system at various distances from the AO guide star. We use a star (#68)
from the globular cluster NGC288 to lock the AO system. Then we offset to nearby
fainter stars to calibrate the aberrations. Note that the magnitude for these fainter
stars is not know, therefore, please decrease the DIT in case we are close to saturation
(which is not really likely though).
Important note: In case the observations cannot be done on the night of Sunday November
13 (bad meteo conditions), then should be attempted the night after.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
This DDT program must be executed on the night of Sunday Nov. 13, 2005,
when the distance between the AO guide star and the TNO is minimum (16"). If, for
some reasons, the execution must be postponed, then a last attempt should be made
the night after (Monday Nov. 14) while the separation is 40". After these two dates,
the program will not be feasible anymore (distance too large between the AO star
and the TNO). A Finding Chart has been provided for the science OB, that shows the
path of the target wrt the AO guide star.
Note that the ephemeris file contains the coordinates for the moving target for
the dates of Nov. 14-15 (UT), as well as separation and RA/DEC offsets from the
AO guide star.
An additional science OB (2003UB313-NACO-Nov15) has been provided in case the observations
happen on Nov. 14 (local) instead of Nov. 13 (local). The aocfg file for each science
OB contains the target coordinates for the corresponding date and does not need
to be edited. The offset values in the last template of the science OB (to record
the PSF quality) also correspond to the offsets for the dates and do not need to
be edited. The tracking tables in the aocfg file also contain the offsets values
corresponding for the dates.
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
If you have PSF reference star OBs, do the names of those OBs begin with
PSF_ ?
If there are Finding Charts attached to your OBs, is the field-of-view
of at least one of these charts 2' x 2' (with clearly labelled field orientation)
?
Have you clearly marked and labelled your wavefront reference objects
R1, R2, R3, ... (as specified in the NAOS Preparation Software) on your Finding
Charts ?
Have you specified the magnitude of the brightest object in the field-of-view
for each OB ?
Are there objects in any of your fields (including standard stars) which
are brighter than the limits specified in the User Manual and on NACO web Pages
?
If the previous answer is yes, have you given a list of OBs and a justification
for the brightness limit violation in the general description field ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:09 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org