README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_60908901

Principal Investigator Email Address

• evalenti@eso.org

Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)

• 03:00:00

General Description

• We propose to obtain spectra in only one setup 36/-1/i (with no AO) of
   4 bright giant stars in the young LMC cluster NGC1866.
  We submitted the following 4 OBs:
  1866_f1, 1866_f2, 1866_br, hip32602, whose a brief description follows below.
  
  OBs 1866_f1 and 1866_f2: same slit configuration
  Two stars (s1 and s1, see the FC) are positioned on the slit, in the way that
  the brightest one (s1, H=11.6) is both the SV guide star
  and the target.
  Since the 1866_f2 is the duplicated of the OB 1866_f1, these two
  OBs could executed easly in a row skipping the acquisition of
  the second one.
  
  OB 1866_br: 
  Two stars (s1 and s2, see FC) are positioned on the slit, the
  brightest one (s1, H=9.95) being the SV guide star. However, in order to
  have both stars on the slit, the target coordinates (in the OB) correspond
  exactely to the mid point of the line connecting the two stars. Please
  make sure that that point is placed in the slit center.
  
  OB Hip32602:
  Only one star (telluric standard) on the slit.

Waiver Requests

• No Waiver Request was submitted

Critical Observing Condition Constraints

• none

Time-Critical Aspects

• none

Special Execution Requirements

• none

Special Calibration Information

• none

ToO Information

• ---(Empty)---

ToO Activators List

• ---(Empty)---

Do the README file and the instrument comments of the telluric stars
 OBs include the required S/N/pixel of the spectrum of the telluric star, its spectral
 type and allowed spectral range?

• N/A

Do any OBs include wavelength or flatfield calibrations?

• NO

If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
 files to your OBs?

• N/A

If the slit viewer guide star is different from the target, are the RA
 and DEC offsets accurate to within 0.05 arcsec and do they take into account the
 relative proper motion between the two objects?

• N/A

If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first for objects
 at similar RA, did you make use of the User Priority field in the OBs?

• YES