README web version of /home/usg/OPS/MTS/readme_xml/readme_60905314
Principal Investigator Email Address
Estimated Total Execution Time (hours, including overheads)
General Description
We propose to use AMBER to measure angular diameters of red giants and
combine them with COROT asteroseismic data which we have priviled access. The combination
of independent techniques provides provides a mean to constraint fundamental stellar
parameters, allowing to test stellar models. The constraints provided by the inferometric
angular diamters are significantly better tha those currently available.
The DG has allocated 70 min to these proposal. We included 3 targets that should
be chosen for this run, there will only be time to observe one of the targets. The
proposal is technically very challenging, HD181907 and HD175679 are observable at
Paranal only at the begining of the night and HD50890 at end of the night. We authorize
any modfification of the chosen OB that may reveal to be important for meeting the
science objective.
Notes:
Same calibrator for HD181907 and HD175679.
HD181907 and HD50890 should be considered the prime targets.
Waiver Requests
Critical Observing Condition Constraints
Time-Critical Aspects
The time window for meeting the ideal observing conditions required to
use UTs+FINITO is limited for the proposed targets. HD181907 and HD175679 are observable
for about 3 hours after the sunset, about one hour between the twilight and airmass
< 1.5. HD50890 is observable for about 3 hours before the sunrise rise, about
one hour between airmass < 1.5 and the twilight.
Special Execution Requirements
Special Calibration Information
ToO Information
ToO Activators List
Is this a Pre-imaging run ?
Pre-imaging Requirements
Source(s) of Pre-imaging
Pre-imaging sources not listed above
Do all your OBs comply with the instrument-specific requirements listed
on the instrument-specific Phase 2 web page ?
If this is a pre-imaging run, did you select PRE-IMAGING for the Observing
Category for each Observing Template ?
Do all your finding charts comply with both the general and instrument-specific
Phase 2 Web Pages ?
If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude
and spectral type of all standard stars in the OBs ?
Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are
not part of the Calibration Plan ?
If you are observing Moving Targets, have you attached suitable ephemeris
files to your OBs?
If you have preferences which OBs should be executed first, did you make
use of the User Priority field in the OBs ?
If this is a run that requires coordinated observations with other facilities,
did you give proper instructions in the Time-Critical Aspects Section ?
Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator
star OB (and vice versa) in the 'Instrument Comments' field ?
Did you check that your chosen calibrator is bright enough for the instrument
mode used ?
If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did
you specify their characteristics in the README file and in the OBs ?
Do you use the same DIT for pairs of science target and associated calibrator?
Are the magnitudes of science target and calibrator within +/- 1 mag
?
Did you verify that your coordinates are as accurate as possible (2Mass
coordinates recommended) and that they include proper motions if available ?
Did you specify the LST range of the calibrators such that they cover
the range from 30 min before the start of the LST range of the science target to
30 min after the end of the LST range of the science target ?
Last creation of page: Tue Oct 6 15:40:06 2009
If you have comments, please contact usd-help@eso.org