README Template 74.1 (please do not delete the README Template Version line!) ESO Programme ID: 74.D-0761(B) Principal Investigator Name: Claes Fransson Principal Investigator E-mail Address: claes@astro.su.se Principal Investigator Telephone Number: +46 8 55 37 85 17 Principal Investigator Postal Address: Stockholm Observatory Alba Nova SE-106 91 Stockholm Sweden Instrument: FLAMES OPC Priority Class: A OPC Approved Total Execution Time: 6.0 hours Estimated Total Execution Time (including overheads): 7.0 hours README File Submission Date: 27. August 2004 Programme Description ===================== General Overview ---------------- High-resolution spectroscopy of SN 1987A ejecta and ring Approved Waiver Request Summary ------------------------------- Extension for submisson by a couple of days. Critical Observing Condition Constraints ---------------------------------------- Since there are two bright neighboring stars and in particular to separate the northern and southern part of the ring the observations should be carried out in better than 0.4" seeing. Time Critical Aspects --------------------- SN 1987A is at -70 degrees DEC and is best observed between November and February. Special Calibration Information ------------------------------- N/A ToO Information --------------- N/A Pre-Imaging Requirements ------------------------ Source of preimaging: N/A OB Information ============== List of Science OBs ------------------- (for ISAAC imaging, please indicate the magnitude of the brightest star in the field for each OB) 87a-Ha-0 87a-Ha-1 87a-OI-0 87a-OI-1 87a-OIII-0 87a-OIII-1 87a-OIII-2 Total Number of Submitted Science OBs: 7 Guide star S0132002305 05 35 05.94 -69 19 47.37 G 1 11.7 1 Fiducial stars S0132002111972 05 35 24.58 -69 18 09.26 F 1 14.0 1 S0132002274 05 35 27.13 -69 13 52.51 F 1 12.5 1 S0132002112864 05 36 18.88 -69 16 07.05 F 1 12.9 1 Hour angle for which the field was calculated is 4 hours. Note all OBs use the same setup. We are looking at a line emission object (in fact, many as the dense blobs in the rings light up). We expect to have roughly a S/N of 30 in the line centres, but falling off very quickly in the wings. Reference wavelengths 6563 (Halpha), 6301 ([OI]) and 5007 ([OIII]). List of Calibration OBs with Associated Science OBs --------------------------------------------------- N/A Total Number of Submitted Calibration OBs: 0 OB Compliance Checks ==================== (Y = Yes, N = No, NA = Not Applicable) Do all your OBs comply with the instrument specific requirements listed on the instrument specific Phase 2 Web pages ? Y Do all your Finding Charts comply with the both the general and instrument-specific finding chart requirements? Y If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you specify the magnitude and spectral type of all standard stars ? N/A Have you included OBs for any calibrations that you need but which are not a part of the Calibration Plan? N/A [UVES only] Do all your UVES OBs use only the allowed templates listed on the UVES Phase 2 Web pages ? N/A [ISAAC only] Did you indicate the magnitude of the brightest star in the field for ISAAC imaging observations? N/A [ISAAC only] If you submitted OBs for standard stars, did you use the provided StandardStar templates? N/A [FLAMES only] Did you specify the hour angle range for which your Target Setup files are valid ? Y [FLAMES only] Did you specify the S/N ratio (at some reference wavelength and per single exposure) you expect to reach with these observations? Y [VIMOS only] Did you specify suitable guide stars for all your OBs using Guidecam? N/A [VIMOS only] Did you check that the chosen guide stars are suitable for all the offset positions and that they do not produce unacceptable vignetting of the field of view? N/A [MIDI only] Did you indicate for each science star OB the corresponding calibrator star OB name in the ReadMe file as well as in the comments of the OB ? N/A [MIDI only] If you use calibrator stars which are not in the CalVin database, did you specify their characteristics in the ReadMe file and in the OBs ? N/A If you answered "NO" to any of these questions, please revise your OBs *before* submission.