![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFI Calibration Plan on the
|
|||||
|
A Calibration Plan is used by the 2p2 Team
for monitoring and calibrating the Wide Field Imager (WFI)
at the 2.2 m telescope. The plan we have adopted has two
components: Instrument Calibration and Standard Calibration.
PIs of Service Mode Programmes should read the section below on
Standard Calibration, to help them to decide whether
they need to specify calibrations as part of their programme.
The notes on this web page are based on (but supercede) the short document
WFI Calibration Plan
of February 2001.
Notes for 2p2 Team Members (only) describing the execution of the plan
and analysis of the data, can be found on
this internal access web page.
Instrument Calibration aims solely to provide data to
quantify instrument behaviour for the information of the Team.
It does not aim to supply calibrations for use in reduction.
However, these Instrument Calibration
data are available to users through the links below.
The analysis of Instrument Calibration data is
undertaken mostly by the 2p2 Team.
Instrument Calibrations are grouped in terms of Short, Medium and Long-Term
Calibrations:
Instrument Calibration:
Short-Term Calibrations | Status | Frequency | Contact | Results Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Bias Levels, Gains, Read-Noises (Daily Health Check) | Running | Daily | F. Selman | Plots showing the variation in read-noise, gain, bias and flat-field levels during the past two months. Data are also shown on a CCD-by-CCD basis. |
Image Quality Database | Running | Hourly (at night) | L. Germany | Scatter plots of FWHM (in both X and Y) against julian day, wind speed and direction. Data encompassing either the current, previous or a range of months can be plotted, as required. |
Pointing Reproducibility (Nightly Health Check) | Running | Nightly | L. Germany | Scatter plot of pointing offsets from a predefined zero position over the past month, or since observations commenced on the current template. (Template fields are followed across the sky for the 3 - 4 months that they are visible.) |
Image Quality Across Mosaic (Nightly Health Check) | Running | Nightly | L. Germany | Diagram showing the latest map of distortion vectors across the eight CCDs of the mosaic. There are also scatter plots of mean ellipticity as a function of time, over the current month, a previous month, or over the entire year. |
Differential Throughput Measurements (Nightly Health Check) | Running | Nightly | L. Germany | Scatter plot of magnitude difference from a predefined zero value for a set of stars from our own calibration fields (not Landolt), as a function of time. Plots show the variation for individual stars over the current month, a previous month, or over the entire year. There is also a scatter plot showing the mean magnitude difference, (as averaged over all stars at a given instant in time), over the current month, a previous month, or the entire year. |
Shutter and Linearity Errors, CCD Transfer Function, Sensitivity to Beta-light, CCD Bias, Gain and RON (Weekly Health Check) | Running | Weekly (Tuesdays) | F. Selman | Plots of bias level, beta-light response gain, shutter error, linearity error, gain and RON over the past three months. Table of CCD transfer function values also given. There are also plots available showing the bias frame statistics, unedited transfer and linearity, and filtered linearity and non-linearity over the range of exposures used for each test. Data are presented on a CCD-by-CCD basis. |
Medium-Term Calibrations | Status | Frequency | Previous Measurement | Next Measurement | Contact | Results Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Badpix mask for WFI | Running | 3 monthly | . | September 2002 | L. Germany | All masks found here. |
Absolute Photometric UBVRI Zeropoints | Running | 6 monthly | 31 May 2001 (FK) | December 2001 | F. Kerber, F. Selman | F. Kerber took calibration data in May which are currently under analysis. |
Astrometric Solution | In Prep | 6 monthly | . | September 2001 | . | . |
Sky Concentration in UBVRI | Running | 6 monthly | April 2001 (JM, FS) | November 2001 | F. Selman | J. Manfroid and F. Selman took independent measurements
and the
results are available in a short paper
by Manfroid, Selman and Jones. F. Kerber took measurements in May 2001 and is analysing the results. |
Long-Term Calibrations | Status | Frequency | Previous Measurement | Next Measurement | Contact | Results Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Telescope Pointing Model | Running | after each M1 removal | March 1999 June 2001 | next re-aluminzation | R. Castillo | R. Castillo measured and analysed the pointing model coefficients. There are plots showing the RMS scatter in each coefficient, and a table summarising the newly-measured values. |
Focus Temperature Change | Running | Yearly | November 2000 | November 2001 | J. Cortes | J. Cortes measured the focus change with temperature in four filters (ESO nos. 842-845). There are plots showing the change in both the X and Y pixel directions, along with the linear best fit and RMS residuals. |
Filter focus offsets | In Prep | Yearly | November 2000 | . | . | . |
Tilt of CCD relative to focal plane | Running | Yearly | January 2000 | October 2001 | . | MIDAS script available for analysis. This (and earlier measurements) need to be located. |
Filter Image Quality | Running | 3 yearly | February 2001 | February 2004 | 2p2 Team | A. Gilliotte measured the imaging quality of the entire filter set,
the results from which are summarised on the
WFI Filter Page
. Filter page needs to be updated with AG's most recent emails |
Information on the Standard Calibration Plan can be found on the
dedicated web page.
Quality Control is the process of checking Service Mode data
to ensure it meets the specifications of the programmes.
This is done during the observations in a cursory way by
MET at the telescope. We hope that in the long term it can also be
done more comprehensively by DMD as the data enter the Archive
(as is the case with VLT).
Formally, it is not part of either calibration plan,
although informally the calibration data will be inspected for
obvious signs of bad data.
Quality Control: